Nerd Arts » philosophy

Nerd Arts

Nerdcore News

Archive for the ‘philosophy’ Category

The Ambiguous Panopticon: Foucault and the Codes of Cyberspace


Sunday, March 25th, 2007

by Mark Winokur

We cannot agree on an historical point of origin for the Internet. (Bletchley Park? The telegraph? The diorama? The abacus? The Atlantic Cable? Painting? Writing?) Its techniques and tools are still in the process of development, perhaps even in their infancy. Internet culture is heterogeneous and dynamic. Its economy is not stable, seeming sometimes as fantastic and illusory as the Internet itself. Its status as global tool or tool of globalization is still unclear. Most importantly, even the object of study, and so the appropriate methodologies for study, are unclear. Like other nascent forms of representation before it, the Internet in its infancy presents itself as — and may actually be — the site of cultural, political, and ideological contestation. Or it may not: the contest may in fact have ended before it began, in which case scholars interested in such things can, like Lawrence Lessig, write only about who won and who lost. The grandest claim one might plausibly make is that the Internet at the present moment is the material actualization of the post-structural indeterminacy that characterizes post-Nixon/Mao/Gandhi representation and cultural theory, from the post-1949 Middle East, to the films of Peter Greenaway, to deconstruction, to White Noise. However, it behooves the critic to find a sector of critical theory through which some of these assertions might be more clearly elaborated.

continue reading

Donna Haraway


Tuesday, March 13th, 2007

The following table is taken from Simians, Cyborgs and Women and illustrates various facets of society, concrete and abstract, that Haraway believes will eventually change. The left column lists the old components of hierarchical dominance; the right column lists the alternatives that will be supplied by a network of equally-valued individuals.

Representation vs. Simulation..
Bourgeois novel, realism vs. Science fiction, postmodernism…
Organism vs. Biotic component….
Depth, integrity vs Surface, boundary….
Heat vs. Noise….
Biology as clinical practice vs. Biology as inscription….
Physiology vs. Communications engineering….
Small group vs. Subsystem….
Perfection vs. Optimization….
Eugenics vs. Population control….
Decadence, Magic Mountain vs. Obsolescence, Future Shock….
Hygiene vs. Stress Management….
Microbiology, tuberculosis vs. Immunology, AIDS….
Organic division of labour vs. Ergonomics/cybernetics of labour….
Functional specialization vs. Modular construction….
Reproduction vs. Replication….
Organic sex role specialization vs. Optimal genetic strategies….
Biological determinism vs. Evolutionary inertia, constraints….
Community ecology vs. Ecosystem….
Racial chain of being vs. Neo-imperialism, United Nations humanism….
Scientific management in home vs. Global factory / electronic cottage….
/factory
Home / market / factory vs. Women in the Integrated Circuit….
Family wage vs. Comparable worth….
Public / Private vs. Cyborg citizenship….
Nature / Culture vs. Fields of difference….
Co-operation vs. Communications enhancement….
Freud vs. Lacan….
Sex vs. Genetic engineering….
Labour vs. Robotics….
Mind vs. Artificial Intelligence….
Second World War vs. Star Wars….
White Capitalist Patriarchy vs. Informatics of Domination….

Systems Theory


Tuesday, March 6th, 2007


(pictured Above Margaret Mead)

An Introduction to Systems Theory
While many view Systems theory, in its broadest sense, as the interdisciplinary study of human life and social organization in terms of systems, in reality, it is the fundamental framework by which one can analyze, describe and predict the behavior of any group of “objects” that work in concert, to produce a result. This could be a single organism, any organization or society, or any electro-mechanical, or informational artifact.

Systems theory as an area of study developed following the World Wars from the work of Ludwig von Bertalanffy, Anatol Rapoport, Kenneth E. Boulding, William Ross Ashby, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, C. West Churchman and others in the 1950s, specifically catalyst from the Macy conferences. Cognizant of advances in science that questioned classical assumptions in the organizational sciences, Bertalanffy’s idea to develop a theory of systems began as early as the interwar period, publishing “An Outline for General Systems Theory” in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol 1, No. 2, by 1950. Where assumptions in Western science from Greek thought with Plato and Aristotle to Newton’s Principia have historically influenced all areas from the social to hard sciences, the original theorists explored the implications of twentieth century advances in terms of systems.

Systems theory as a technical and general academic area of study predominantly refers to the science of systems that resulted from Bertalanffy’s General System Theory (GST) among the others mentioned in initiating what became a project of research and practice to develop systems theory. Ideas from systems theory have grown with diversified areas, exemplified by the the work of Bela H. Banathy, ecological systems with Howard T. Odum, Eugene P Odum and Fritjof Capra, organizational theory and management with individuals such as Peter Senge, interdisciplinary study with areas like Human Resource Development from the work of Richard A. Swanson, and insights from educators such as Debora Hammond. As a transdisciplinary, interdisciplinary and multiperspectival domain, the area brings together principles and concepts from ontology, philosophy of science, physics, computer science, biology, and engineering as well as geography, sociology, political science, psychotherapy (within family systems therapy) and economics among others. Systems theory, research and practice serve as a bridge for areas to engage in interdisciplinary dialogue and advance ideas for their own autonomous frames as well as within the area of systems science itself.

In this respect, with the possibility of misinterpretations, Bertalanffy (1950: 142) believed a general theory of systems “should be an important regulative device in science,” to guard against superficial analogies that “are useless in science and harmful in their practical consequences.” Others remain closer to the direct systems concepts developed by the original theorists. For example, Ilya Prigogine, of the Center for Complex Quantum Systems at the University of Texas, Austin, has studied emergent properties, suggesting that they offer analogues for living systems. The theories of Autopoiesis of Francisco Varela and Humberto Maturana are a further development in this field. Important names in contemporary systems science at the dusk of the Cold War include Russell Ackoff, Bela Banathy, Stanford Beer, Mandy Brown, Peter Checkland, Robert Flood, Fritjof Capra, Michael Jackson, and Werner Ulrich, among others.
via Wikipedia

Donna Haraway: Cyborg Manifesto


Wednesday, February 28th, 2007


AN IRONIC DREAM OF A COMMON LANGUAGE FOR WOMEN IN THE INTEGRATED CIRCUIT

This chapter is an effort to build an ironic political myth faithful to feminism, socialism, and materialism. Perhaps more faithful as blasphemy is faithful, than as reverent worship and identification. Blasphemy has always seemed to require taking things very seriously. I know no better stance to adopt from within the secular-religious, evangelical traditions of United States politics, including the politics of socialist feminism. Blasphemy protects one from the moral majority within, while still insisting on the need for community. Blasphemy is not apostasy. Irony is about contradictions that do not resolve into larger wholes, even dialectically, about the tension of holding incompatible things together because both or all are necessary and true. Irony is about humour and serious play. It is also a rhetorical strategy and a political method, one I would like to see more honoured within socialist-feminism. At the centre of my ironic faith, my blasphemy, is the image of the cyborg.

Read On